First, a joke. Here is the Wall Street Journal’s What’s News summary for today:

Good afternoon. Here’s what you should know today, Oct. 15:

– Gaza’s lack of clean water and fuel-starved hospitals further endanger Palestinians bracing for invasion, the U.N. says – Economists now think the U.S. will dodge a recession – Prices at the pump are tumbling

Yay! More gas for us! And we can go back to swilling up the goods and spoils, back to NORMAL, thanks all to Bidenomics!

Oh and those Gaza fuckers – they are going to starve and dehydrate. No need to worry about gas prices – ’cause they ain’t getting none! And recession? Living in a Stalag daily, “economy” is kind of a funny thing to say.

Disclaimer: if I am taking sides, it is the side of the innocent, whoever they may be, that I am taking. On the opposite side is anyone – and we are talking about specific political groups here, not Peoples – anyone who uses death and torture as a solution to achieving their agenda. I’ll have to have a T-shirt made with this printed on it, if I don’t want to get shot (or audited) outright. People can’t handle – meaning, they don’t have the tools to work with – the Truth.

But I digress. I wanted to talk about Charles Manson. Well, not about him – he was a thug and a loser, which the media glorified beyond proportion. Instead, I want to focus on his grand philosophy, “Helter Skelter”.

If you didn’t read the book, you don’t know what Helter Skelter is.

Manson spoke for over an hour. As to Helter Skelter, he said the following: It means confusion, literally. It doesn’t mean any war with anyone. It doesn’t mean that some people are going to kill other people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helter_Skelter_(scenario)

The full scenario was itself a Holocaust, initiated by the uprising of American Blacks, after centuries of heinous abuse, murder, rape, and disenfranchisement by American Whites. Mason predicted a final breaking point, where Blacks would simply stop tolerating the countless injustices.

Manson, according to Family member Brooks Poston, “said a group of real blacks would come out of the ghettos and do an atrocious crime in the richer sections of Los Angeles and other cities. They would do an atrocious murder with stabbing, killing, cutting bodies to pieces, smearing blood on the walls, writing ‘pigs’ on the walls … in the victims’ own blood.”^[2]: 245

When frightened whites, according to Watkins and Tex Watson, would retaliate with a murderous rampage,^[7] militant blacks would exploit it to provoke a war of near-extermination between racist and non-racist whites over the treatment of blacks. In the wake of that, black militants would arise to finish off the few white survivors and to kill off all non-blacks.^[5][6]

In this holocaust, … the blacks, who, having “completed the white man’s karma“, would want no longer to kill.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helter_Skelter_(scenario)

Now, I realize it is a little crazy to quote psychotic killers. But sometimes you have to dig in the dirt for Truth. I can’t help but see the veracity of Manson’s predictions, through the lens of reactions to events such as Rodney King and the police killings of Trayvon Martin, etc. (yes, the list is, as you know, much longer!). NOT SAYING that US Black behaved in the way Mason described, (for those with dyslexia). I am pointing out solely that in recent times, American Blacks have signaled that they do not intend to take the White Man’s shit any longer!

But instead of reacting with this horrific Manson violence, they followed the order of passive resistance. – they organized, into Black Lives Matter, and, through this political means, attempted to raise awareness (as though it had been invisible?), of the White Man, to the injustice He continues to perpetrate.

And the White Man wiped his ass with BLM – true to form. Now again, I want to be careful as to whom I am addressing – NOT all white people. In fact, we saw an odd response from a significant proportion of Whites to BLM – the emergence of the gleeful “cancel culture”, in which the BLM was appropriated by White power classes, to exorcise certain groups and people, whom those power classes were tired of, anyway. In other words, BLM had the effect – not through the intention of its founders and true proponents, mind you – of dividing the already confused Whites, against one another. Sound familiar? I’ll repeat:

to provoke a war of near-extermination between racist and non-racist whites over the treatment of blacks.

Ibid.

Am I wrong here? Seems pretty spot on – except I don’t see this as the intention of BLM – it was an unpredictable (kinda) reaction by bored, wealthy Whites, or worse, galvanized autocratic Whites, who exploited the BLM to their own ends. The first is just common knowledge – apathetic White people do stuff for excitement. Given. The latter is a conspiracy theory. Sorry. I don’t know what to believe.

I still haven’t gotten to my point: I want to pose a parallel to the current crisis in Gaza. To lay it out plainly, I want to compare the Jews, who suffered a well-known, lengthy, history of atrocity and injustice, to the Blacks who experienced something similar, in the form of centuries of human trafficking. Sound reasonable?

There is one difference that bears consideration: who is to blame in each case? I think for Blacks, there is no grey area: they were exploited by slavers, mostly European, and welcomed by almost ALL Whites in the nascent United States. It’s the proverbial White Man, who bears all the blame.

However, for the Jews, it’s not so clear. I could say that everyone, throughout history, persecuted the Jews. You’ve got Romans, Babylonians, Assyrians, Catholics – to name a few of the first-round assassins. Then you get the Nazis, more in our modern consciousness.

A word on the Nazis: the mistreatment of the Jews did not originate with them, nor was it limited to them. If you have the chance to actually study and think, you can discover for yourself that Hitler rose to power, not on his own – he was a buffoon (therein, he resembles Trump, but not in much else), buoyed by an angry, violent populous, who ALREADY hated Jews, and blamed them for all their woes. Hitler did not have to think up any of the horrors enacted on the Jews – the Weimar German people had PLENTY of ideas. Hitler, like Trump, just had to repeat, echo, and eventually take full blame, for the will of an angry, ravenous populous.

STOP: Not defending Hitler here: you ride in the clown car, you are a clown.

So now the fun part: score keeping, and blind justice! Take the poll:

1. Were the Weimar Germans justified in their anger? Did they truly suffer enough to justify what they did (through Hitler)?
2. Were the Weimar Germans correct in pointing to the Jews as the ultimate cause of all their woes?
3. Are American Blacks justified in their retaliations (the degree of retaliatory actions), agains White injustice?
4. To what degree do you consider American Blacks justified? How would you react if, for example, they fulfilled Manson’s phrophesy of “come out of the ghettos and do an atrocious crime in the richer sections of Los Angeles and other cities. They would do an atrocious murder with stabbing, killing, cutting bodies to pieces, smearing blood on the walls, writing ‘pigs’ on the walls … in the victims’ own blood.”^[2]: 245” Would you stand by them? Consider carefully all you know about their justification: slaves were maimed, dismembered, raped, decapitated, disemboweled, and castrated, to name a few…
5. How would “America” – that faceless entity that we all either claim, or denounce, depending on saving our own pride. -react to such a Black uprising?
6. Is the violent attack on either the oppressor, no matter their guilt, or the violent retaliation of the oppressor, no mater their injustice, EVER a productive path to a true resolution?

For the record, the American Blacks NEVER have, and NEVER will react with such stupid brutality, as their oppressors. The Black Panthers, though wrongly portrayed, were an entirely legal, passive, albeit “aggressive”, movement toward peace, albeit a separatist peace. Whatever violence occurred in LA after Rodney Kings brutal arrest, there was NOTHING of the freak show engendered by Hamas.

Thus, I am not trying so hard to draw a parallel between American Blacks, and Hamas. Hamas is a militant, extremist, independent agent, not endorsed by Islam. They do not accurately represent the sentiment of all Muslims, perhaps not even that many Muslims. Certainly, is is not the will of devout Muslims to enact such heinous displys of sadism, upon innocents. You can check the Q’ran yourself on that.

While there is certainly a deep anger swelling among those who identify as Palestinians (remember that the region called Palestine, or “Phillistia“, historically, has a cloudy history), it is rarely the case that this particular kind of gruesome terrorist response would be accepted. To conflagrate the horror of Hamas to include any larger Arabic group is either a serious mistake in judgment, or a form of conspriatory weaponization of a general emotion, to some ulterior end.

The answer has already been given, and the giver gave his life to deliver this answer:

“Violence begets violence; hate begets hate; and toughness begets a greater toughness. It is all a descending spiral, and the end is destruction — for everybody. Along the way of life, someone must have enough sense and morality to cut off the chain of hate.”

-Martin Luther King Jr.